{"generated_at":"2026-08-08T09:19:08.460599+00:00","key_stats":{"computed":"2026-08-08T06:50:31.509632+00:00","constraint":53,"dcpi_score":26.2,"excess":37,"facility_count":95,"name":"Columbus","recent_deals":[{"buyer":"Meta","date":null,"mw":null,"seller":null,"value":null},{"buyer":"Duos Technologies","date":null,"mw":null,"seller":null,"value":15.0}],"slug":"columbus","state":"OH","top_operators":[{"count":11,"name":"Google"},{"count":9,"name":"Amazon Web Services"},{"count":8,"name":"Unknown"},{"count":6,"name":""},{"count":6,"name":"Cologix"}],"total_mw":2230.0,"verdict":"AVOID"},"model":"claude-haiku-4-5","name":"Columbus","narrative_md":"Columbus operates 95 tracked facilities totaling 2,230 MW, making it a mid-tier market by scale. Google leads operator presence with 11 facilities, followed by AWS with 9, while Cologix and an unnamed operator each run 6 sites. The market is fragmented across a long tail of smaller operators, reflecting neither the consolidation of mature hyperscale hubs nor the speculative greenfield dynamics of emerging markets.\n\nThe DCPI verdict of AVOID is driven by a constraint score of 53/100 that dominates the investment calculus despite a moderate excess-power reading of 37/100. A constraint score above 50 signals meaningful friction in land acquisition, power supply reliability, or cooling infrastructure\u2014the three variables that determine whether new capacity can be built within reasonable timelines and cost structures. For acquisition-focused investors, this threshold is typically disqualifying; for operators seeking expansion sites, it means extended permitting cycles, higher infrastructure costs, or competition for limited utility capacity. Investors evaluating Columbus should not view this as a near-term entry point unless they have site control or utility commitments already secured.\n\nM&A activity is sparse and tells a cautionary story. Duos Technologies acquired a Columbus data center property for $15 million with an additional $15 million earnout structure, a deal that suggests the asset required performance-tied consideration\u2014typical when buyer confidence in revenue trajectory is guarded. Meta's announced millions-dollar investment in Columbus trades signals interest in the region, but no tracked acquisition has closed, indicating that deal negotiation and permitting remain protracted. The absence of major operator consolidation or hyperscaler expansion announcements in recent quarters reinforces the constraint picture; capital is flowing elsewhere.\n\nColumbus remains a secondary market with structural headwinds that will persist through 2026 unless utility or zoning environments shift materially. Investors should monitor water-use policy developments and regional power availability before reassessing entry.","slug":"columbus","word_count":295}